The public schools are conducting the CST tests again. It’s going on in second through eleventh grades, and kids are feeling the pressure.
Each year around this time, the schools start sending emails and notices reminding us to make sure our kids get plenty of sleep and eat a good breakfast before school. If we didn’t ordinarily do that for the sake of our kids’ education, why would we do it now?
The students have been spending a lot of time in the last few weeks studying for this exam. They’ve spent class time and homework time reviewing material that they’ve studied in past years so that they’ll do well on those portions of the tests.
I send my kids to school so they can get an education. But for a few weeks every year they stop the teaching and focus on the testing. Now, I understand that tests are a part of education. You learn something and then take a test. If you do well on the test, you’ve learned the material. If not, you have more work to do. This is not what the standardized tests are about.
The standardized tests also cover material that kids learned last year or the year before. Is reviewing this material beneficial to the students? Well, I know that I’ve forgotten some of the things I learned in school. Everyone does. Is it worth the time to re-learn it so that you can keep all those facts in your head? In most cases I think the answer is no. And the fact that schools don’t review old material (except to bring kids back up to speed after summer break) seems to bear that out.
The schools are putting so much emphasis on these tests that some kids are stressed out about it. They don’t get this worked up about final exams. I’ve had a child cry before school on testing days because they were so worried about doing well. The material they’re being tested on is different from the curriculum that they are studying in their classes, and the results have nothing to do with the grades they receive this trimester.
Schools have been accused of ‘teaching to the test’. This means that they teach the materials that will be on the test in a way that maximizes the probability that the kids will fill in the right bubble when it’s time. (They even received instruction this week on how to properly fill in the bubble!) Is this what the kids should be learning in order to be successful in life?
Why are they doing all of this? So the school’s test scores will look good. Schools are judged by their average test scores, and the schools will do whatever they can to improve those scores. Including lean on the students.
If these tests are meant to measure how well the school teaches, let the kids take the test with no pressure. If they know the material, they’ll get the answers right. If they don’t, we’ll know where the school needs to improve.
But with schools essentially competing against each other, they have to do whatever they can to improve their results.
I’ve recently learned that I’m not the only parent who hates these tests. I’ve grumbled about it for years, but never done anything about it or even objected to the school. A lot of parents are objecting in a meaningful way. They’re pulling their kids out of the tests.
But then how do we measure the school’s performance? It is to everyone’s benefit to learn which schools are not educating our children well. And even for schools that are doing well, what are the weak areas that they should work on? Of course after they get the results, they need to take a common sense look at why under-performing schools aren’t doing well. For example, there are some schools in Orange County that serve many motel families. These kids move around a lot and have bigger issues in their lives than studying. But the state sees the low test scores and sends the teachers for more training. That’s not going to fix the problem because that’s not the source of the trouble. But I digress. How to measure the schools without the overly competitive environment? Wouldn’t it be great if someone who didn’t have a stake in the outcome could administer the test?



I think the real issue is not who administers the testing … it is the reason for the testing itself.
No change will come of having someone else monitor the test, or even changing the type of test so that (in theory) the teachers can’t “teach to the test”. I propose that these stadardized tests, designed to test RETENTION of information, be given on the 2nd or 3rd day after school starts in the fall. The scores will go down from what we have now, but wouldn’t this be a better benchmark of how the schools are really doing … what do their students RETAIn after a summer off (and the 3 year coverage of the testing … of course).
I don’t think this would fly, however. The teacher’s union would fight it tooth and nail … once again proving that the union (not all the teacher, mind you) have more important agendas than the actual education of our students.
Comment by UseLogic — May 14, 2009 @ 9:33 am
Its a difficult choice for parents finding a good school for their children. At many times we come to know about the shortcomings in a school only after admission. Politics slows down in upgrading the curriculum being up-to-date. Government should therefor have a proper monitoring system in education sector.
Comment by Massage Marketing — August 2, 2009 @ 9:42 am
I have been shouting the same sentiments for years and will finally pull my children out of this testing this school year. They’ve (children( been telling me for years about how much cheating goes on in these tests. I home school some of my children, and the public schools have a definite advantage with respects to the CST tests.
Comment by D. Jones — August 27, 2009 @ 3:53 pm